This is an AI translation. Check dates, amounts and eligibility against the Korean original and the official page.

Search

Enter for all results, Esc to close

Wages, Minimum Wage & Severance PayOther

Ruling recognizing severance pay only for work after the industrial trainee period ended

The short answer: The two workers partly won: severance pay was recognized for the period after training, but the damages claim was rejected.

Two people who had worked in Korea as foreign industrial trainees claimed severance pay. The court recognized severance pay only for the period worked after the training period ended, and did not accept the claim for compensation for emotional distress.

Who this helps

This may help people who worked as foreign industrial trainees and kept working at the same company after the training period ended.

Case overview

Court
Busan District Court
Posted on original board
Topic
Wages, Minimum Wage & Severance Pay
Original title (Korean)
외국인 산업연수생에게 퇴직금을 지급하여야 하는지 여부(한정 적극)

Two Filipino nationals entered Korea as foreign industrial technical trainees and worked at a company as industrial trainees for 2 years. After the training period ended, they kept working at the same company until 15 June 2003, then left the company. They claimed from the company severance pay including the period worked as trainees, and compensation for emotional distress over discrimination in not paying severance pay.

Can severance pay be claimed for time worked as a foreign industrial trainee?

Two Filipinos entered as foreign industrial technical trainees and worked at a company for two years. They kept working there after the training period until June 15, 2003, then left. They claimed severance pay including the trainee years, plus damages for discrimination. The court held that the severance rules of the Labor Standards Act did not apply to the trainee period.

How the court ruled

The court held that the severance pay provisions of the Labor Standards Act did not apply to the period worked as industrial trainees. It found that an implied employment contract was formed between the company and the two people from the day after the training period ended until the date of leaving, and ordered payment of severance pay and delayed-payment damages for that period. It did not accept the claim for compensation for emotional distress, because the duty to pay severance pay arises after leaving the job, so discrimination during employment could not be found.

What to check in a similar situation

Which period counts as the training period for a severance claim can be checked with the courts or the government labor offices.

Terms explained

industrial trainee
A foreigner who comes to learn skills through training at a company. In this ruling, the severance rules of the labor law were not applied to the training period.
implied employment contract
A work relationship treated as a contract from how the parties acted, even without a written agreement.
delay damages
Extra money added when an amount owed was not paid on time.
damages for emotional distress
Money claimed for mental suffering, such as from discrimination.

More rulings on this topic

See all 3 rulings on Wages, Minimum Wage & Severance Pay →

Frequently asked questions

Who brought the case?

Two Filipinos who entered as foreign industrial technical trainees and worked at a company.

How did the court rule?

It found an implied employment contract from the day after training ended until retirement and recognized severance pay and delay damages for that period. It rejected the damages claim because the duty to pay severance arises after retirement, so discrimination during employment could not be found.

Does this result apply to every similar case?

No. It is the court's decision in this case and does not apply as is to other cases.

Source and original

Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide

View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=804&gubun=44

See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44

Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html

← Back to ruling news