Marriage & FamilyAdministrative
Ruling: Extension of Stay for a Foreigner With Child Visitation Rights Is to Be Decided With Greater Care
The short answer: The court held that the authority is to decide such stay extension requests more carefully, from a humanitarian viewpoint.
The court ruled that when a foreigner married to a Korean national has been granted the right to see their child, the administrative authority is to decide on an extension of stay more carefully from a humanitarian perspective.
Who this helps
This may help people who are foreign spouses of Korean nationals and have been granted the right to see their child, and who are dealing with a stay extension request.
Case overview
- Case number
- 2016구단61337
- Court
- Seoul Administrative Court
- Date of judgment
- Topic
- Marriage & Family
- Original title (Korean)
대한민국 국적의 자녀에 관한 면접교섭권이 인정되는 외국인에 대한 체류기간연장신청에 관한 판단…
A foreigner was married to a Korean national. Through court mediation or similar proceedings, visitation rights, meaning the right to see the child born to the couple, were recognized. This lawsuit concerns the foreigner's application to extend the period of stay.
Does a parent's right to see a child affect how a stay extension is reviewed?
A foreigner married to a Korean national was granted the right to see the child born to the couple, through court mediation or similar means. The dispute was over that person's request to extend the period of stay. The court noted that such mediation can have the same effect as a final judgment. Even so, it saw a risk that immigration measures, such as refusing the extension, could effectively block the visits. So it held that the authority is to decide these requests more carefully, from a humanitarian viewpoint.
How the court ruled
The court noted that mediation and similar proceedings have the same effect as a final judgment. Even so, it found a concern that visitation rights could be effectively blocked by immigration-related measures, such as a refusal to grant an extension of stay. The court therefore held that, for a foreigner in this situation, the administrative authority is to decide whether to grant an extension of stay more carefully from a humanitarian perspective.
What to check in a similar situation
Details on how a stay extension request is handled can be checked with the immigration or foreigner office that has jurisdiction. The court that recognized the visitation rights can confirm what the mediation or judgment says.
- Marriage migrant (F-6) documents
- Divorce guide
- Changing your status of stay
- Contacts: Immigration Contact Center 1345
Terms explained
- Visitation rights
- The right of a parent who does not live with a child to meet and spend time with that child. In this case, it was recognized through court mediation or similar means.
- Extension of stay
- An application to remain in Korea beyond the period of stay already granted. The immigration authority decides whether to approve it.
- Humanitarian viewpoint
- A way of judging that takes into account the person's real-life circumstances, such as family ties, and not only the strict rules.
More rulings on this topic
- Stay extension denial unlawful: Korean spouse mainly caused marriage breakdown · Seoul Administrative Court
- Ruling that a refusal to issue a marriage immigration visa was not unlawful · Seoul Administrative Court
- Ruling Upholds Refusal to Issue a Marriage Migration Visa · Seoul Administrative Court
Frequently asked questions
Who was involved in this case?
The case involved a foreigner married to a Korean national. The person had been granted the right to see the child born to the couple. The lawsuit concerned that person's request to extend the period of stay.
How did the court judge the matter?
The court said that immigration measures, such as refusing an extension, could effectively block the parent from seeing the child. It therefore held that the authority is to decide such extensions more carefully, from a humanitarian viewpoint.
Does this result apply the same way to every similar case?
No. It is the court's judgment in this one case and does not apply as is to other cases.
Source and original
Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide
View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=18325&gubun=44
See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44
Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html