Marriage & FamilyOther
Ruling cancelling the refusal of a stay extension, etc., for a foreign national married to a Korean citizen
The short answer: The applicant (plaintiff) won, and the court cancelled the refusal to change the stay status.
A Pakistani national who registered a marriage with a Korean citizen sued to cancel a decision refusing a change of status of stay. The court granted the applicant's claim.
Who this helps
This may be useful as a reference for a foreign national who registered a marriage with a Korean citizen and was refused a change to spouse status over a marriage certificate issue under home-country law.
Case overview
- Court
- Daegu District Court
- Date of judgment
- Topic
- Marriage & Family
- Original title (Korean)
외국인의 체류자격을 규정한 출입국관리법 시행령 제12조 [별표 1] 소정의 ‘배우자’라 함은 우리나라 법률에 의하여…
A Pakistani national stayed in Korea on a non-professional employment visa. After registering a marriage with a Korean citizen, this person applied to change status to that of a spouse of a Korean citizen. The head of the immigration office refused, saying there was no valid marriage certificate under Pakistani law and no genuine married life. The applicant then sued to cancel that decision.
Can a change to spouse status be refused because there is no marriage certificate under home-country law?
A Pakistani national staying on a non-professional employment visa registered a marriage with a Korean citizen. The person then applied to change to the status of spouse of a national. The head of the immigration office refused, saying there was no valid marriage certificate under Pakistani law and no genuine married life. The court read "spouse" in the enforcement decree as a foreigner whose marriage to a Korean citizen is recognized under Korean law, not under the foreigner's home-country law.
How the court ruled
The court held that 'spouse' in the enforcement decree on status of stay means a foreign national whose marriage to a Korean citizen is recognized as established under Korean law, not one whose marriage is established under the law of the home country. The court found that the applicant had registered the marriage and had continued to live together with the spouse. It therefore cancelled the refusal as an unlawful decision based on a mistaken view of the facts, and ordered the authority that made the decision to bear the litigation costs.
What to check in a similar situation
Official immigration and foreigner offices can confirm what reasons and documents are used when reviewing a stay status change. Courts can confirm how a lawsuit against a refusal proceeds.
- Marriage migrant (F-6) documents
- Divorce guide
- Changing your status of stay
- Contacts: Immigration Contact Center 1345
Terms explained
- change of stay status
- This means a foreign national staying in Korea switches from the current status to a different stay status.
- spouse
- In this ruling, it means a foreigner whose marriage to a Korean citizen is recognized under Korean law.
- cancellation of a refusal
- This is when a court finds an agency's refusal unlawful and removes its effect.
- home-country law
- This means the law of the country whose nationality the foreigner holds. The court did not use it as the standard for who counts as a spouse.
More rulings on this topic
- Stay extension denial unlawful: Korean spouse mainly caused marriage breakdown · Seoul Administrative Court
- Ruling that a refusal to issue a marriage immigration visa was not unlawful · Seoul Administrative Court
- Ruling Upholds Refusal to Issue a Marriage Migration Visa · Seoul Administrative Court
Frequently asked questions
Who filed the lawsuit?
A Pakistani national who had stayed on a non-professional employment visa filed it. The person had registered a marriage with a Korean citizen and asked the court to cancel the refusal.
How did the court decide?
The court used Korean law to decide who counts as a spouse. It found the marriage was registered and the couple kept living together, so it cancelled the refusal.
Does this result apply as-is to every similar case?
No. This is the decision in that one case and does not apply as-is to other cases.
Source and original
Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide
View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=9107&gubun=44
See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44
Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html