This is an AI translation. Check dates, amounts and eligibility against the Korean original and the official page.

Search

Enter for all results, Esc to close

Stay Status & Period of StayAdministrative

Court rules departure order and residence permit revocation against foreigner caught while working one day-labor shift unlawful

The short answer: The court ruled that the departure order and the residence permit revocation violated the proportionality principle and were unlawful.

A departure order and a residence permit revocation issued to a foreigner without a status of stay permitting employment, caught providing day labor once, were found unlawful for violating the principle of proportionality.

Who this helps

This may help people curious about cases where a foreigner without work-eligible residence status was caught doing day labor once and received a departure order or a permit revocation.

Case overview

Case number
2024구단15681
Court
Seoul Administrative Court
Posted on original board
Topic
Stay Status & Period of Stay
Original title (Korean)
[출입국] 취업활동을 할 수 있는 체류자격 없이 일용노동을 1회 제공하던 중 적발된…

A foreigner without a status of stay permitting employment activities was caught while providing day labor once. A departure order and a residence permit revocation were issued against this foreigner, and a lawsuit was filed against these dispositions.

Can a departure order and permit revocation be unlawful when a foreigner was caught doing day labor once?

A foreigner without a residence status that allows work was caught providing day labor once. A departure order and a residence permit revocation were issued against this person. A lawsuit was filed over these measures. The court found that both measures violated the proportionality principle and were unlawful.

How the court ruled

The court found that the departure order and the residence permit revocation violated the principle of proportionality and were therefore unlawful.

What to check in a similar situation

The content and reasons of a departure order or permit revocation can be checked at the immigration office. Information on the lawsuit procedure for such measures can be checked at the court with jurisdiction.

Terms explained

Proportionality principle
This is the principle that an administrative measure may not go beyond what its purpose requires. Here, the court found that both measures broke this principle.
Departure order
This is an administrative measure ordering a foreigner to leave Korea within a set period.
Residence permit revocation
This is a measure in which an administrative agency cancels the effect of a residence permit already granted.
Residence status
This is a status that sets the range of activities a foreigner may do while staying in Korea.

More rulings on this topic

See all 9 rulings on Stay Status & Period of Stay →

Frequently asked questions

Which measures were at issue?

The departure order and the residence permit revocation issued to a foreigner without work-eligible residence status, after being caught doing day labor once, were at issue.

How did the court rule?

The Seoul Administrative Court found that both measures violated the proportionality principle and were unlawful.

Does this result apply directly to similar cases?

This is the court's judgment on that specific case. It cannot be seen as applying directly to other cases.

Source and original

Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide

View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=26860&gubun=44

See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44

Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html

← Back to ruling news