This is an AI translation. Check dates, amounts and eligibility against the Korean original and the official page.

Search

Enter for all results, Esc to close

Stay Status & Period of StayAdministrative

Court upholds refusal to permit change of residence status applied for together with a refugee application on the stay expiry date

The short answer: The court held that the refusal to permit the change of residence status was lawful.

A foreign national applied for a change of residence status together with a refugee application on the day the period of stay expired, but it was not permitted. The court found this refusal lawful.

Who this helps

This may help people who filed a refugee application and a status change application together on the stay expiry date and were refused. It explains how the court judged this one case.

Case overview

Case number
2024구단702
Court
Seoul Administrative Court
Posted on original board
Topic
Stay Status & Period of Stay
Original title (Korean)
[일반] 외국인이 체류기간 만료일에 난민신청과 함께 신청한 체류자격 변경을 불허가한…

A foreign national applied for a change of residence status together with a refugee application on the day the period of stay expired. A disposition refusing to permit the change of residence status was issued, and a lawsuit was filed over it. The disposition was made in accordance with the Ministry of Justice's refugee affairs guidelines.

Is it unlawful to refuse a status change applied for together with a refugee application on the expiry date?

A foreign national applied to change residence status together with a refugee application on the stay expiry date. The change was not permitted, and a lawsuit was filed over that refusal. The refusal followed the Ministry of Justice's refugee affairs guidelines. The court saw ample room to view the refugee application as an abusive means of extending the stay.

How the court ruled

The court found there was ample room to view the refugee application as abusive, made as a means of extending the period of stay. It held that the refusal of the change of residence status, made in accordance with the Ministry of Justice's refugee affairs guidelines, neither exceeded nor abused discretion and was therefore lawful.

What to check in a similar situation

The immigration or foreigner office can confirm how a status change application was handled and why it was refused. The court can confirm the procedure for a lawsuit over such a decision.

Terms explained

change of residence status
A procedure to ask to switch from the current residence status to a different one.
refugee affairs guidelines
Internal standards the Ministry of Justice follows when handling refugee matters. The refusal in this case followed them.
deviation or abuse of discretion
Using an agency's decision-making power beyond its allowed limits or wrongly. The court found none here.

More rulings on this topic

See all 9 rulings on Stay Status & Period of Stay →

Frequently asked questions

What was disputed in this case?

A foreign national applied to change residence status with a refugee application on the stay expiry date. It was refused, and a lawsuit followed.

How did the court decide?

It saw ample room to view the refugee application as an abusive means of extending the stay. It found no deviation or abuse of discretion, so the refusal was lawful.

Does this result apply to every similar case?

No. This is the court's judgment in that case and does not apply as is to other cases.

Source and original

Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide

View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=25957&gubun=44

See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44

Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html

← Back to ruling news