This is an AI translation. Check dates, amounts and eligibility against the Korean original and the official page.

Search

Enter for all results, Esc to close

RefugeesOther

Ruling revoking the decision not to recognize as a refugee a Chinese national who helped North Korean defectors

The short answer: The plaintiff won, and the court revoked the decision not to recognize the plaintiff as a refugee.

A plaintiff of Chinese nationality applied for refugee status but was not recognized as a refugee. The court revoked the decision not to recognize the plaintiff as a refugee.

Who this helps

This may be a useful reference for people curious how a refugee denial was assessed in a case involving help given to North Korean defectors.

Case overview

Court
Jeju District Court
Posted on original board
Topic
Refugees
Original title (Korean)
탈북자 지원 활동에 관여한 중국인의 난민 지위를 인정한 사례

The plaintiff is a Chinese national. The plaintiff helped North Korean defectors inside China escape from China, then left China and lived in Laos and other places. The plaintiff later entered Korea to apply for refugee status, and a decision was made not to recognize the plaintiff as a refugee.

Can the denial of refugee status to a Chinese national who helped North Korean defectors be revoked?

The plaintiff is a Chinese national. The plaintiff helped North Korean defectors in China escape, then left China and lived in Laos and other places. The plaintiff then entered Korea to apply for refugee status, but was not recognized as a refugee. The court looked at the nature of the activities, the criminal punishment imposed by Chinese authorities, and the activities carried out in third countries.

How the court ruled

The court examined the nature of the plaintiff's activities supporting defectors, the record of criminal punishment imposed by the Chinese authorities for those activities, and the content of the plaintiff's activities supporting defectors in third countries outside China. As a result, the court found that the plaintiff is unable, owing to a well-founded fear of persecution because of the political opinion revealed through the act of supporting defectors living in China, to avail of the protection of the country of nationality. Therefore, the court revoked the decision not to recognize the plaintiff as a refugee.

What to check in a similar situation

The procedure for deciding refugee recognition can be confirmed with immigration and foreigner offices, and the lawsuit procedure for challenging a decision can be confirmed with the courts.

Terms explained

refugee
A person outside their country of nationality who cannot receive that country's protection because of a well-founded fear of persecution.
political opinion
In this case, the views and stance shown through the plaintiff's support for defectors were treated as falling here.
revocation of a decision
A court undoes an administrative decision so that it no longer has effect.

More rulings on this topic

See all 29 rulings on Refugees →

Frequently asked questions

Who filed the lawsuit?

A Chinese national, who had applied for refugee status but was not recognized as a refugee.

How did the court rule?

The court found that the plaintiff could not receive the protection of the country of nationality because of a well-founded fear of persecution for political opinion, and revoked the denial.

Does this result apply as is to similar cases?

No. It is the court's decision in this case and does not apply as is to other cases.

Source and original

Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide

View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=19623&gubun=44

See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44

Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html

← Back to ruling news