This is an AI translation. Check dates, amounts and eligibility against the Korean original and the official page.

Search

Enter for all results, Esc to close

RefugeesOther

Court rules that a deportation order issued right after a refugee application was unlawful

The short answer: The court held the deportation order unlawful, so the plaintiff who applied for refugee recognition won.

For a deportation order issued right after a refugee recognition application, the court found the action unlawful because it went beyond and abused discretionary power.

Who this helps

This may help people wondering how a court viewed a deportation order issued right after a refugee application. It reflects only this case's reasoning.

Case overview

Case number
2015구단50576
Court
Seoul Administrative Court
Date of judgment
Topic
Refugees
Original title (Korean)
원고가 난민인정신청을 한 직후 이루어진 원고에 대한 강제퇴거명령이 재량권을 일탈, 남용하여…

A deportation order was issued against a person who had applied for refugee recognition, right after the application, and a lawsuit was filed against it. The agency that issued the order argued that it would not actually carry out the deportation order until the lawsuit over refugee status was over.

Is a deportation order issued right after a refugee application unlawful?

A deportation order was issued right after a person applied for refugee recognition, and the order was challenged in court. The authority said it would not actually enforce the order until the lawsuit over refugee status ended. The court found it hard to see any benefit in issuing the order earlier. It also said the public interest in ordering right after the application was not great, since an order could be issued and enforced quickly once non-recognition became final.

How the court ruled

The court found the deportation order unlawful because it went beyond and abused discretionary power. It said that if the order would not be carried out until the lawsuit ended, it is hard to find any benefit in issuing the order before then. Since the order can be issued and carried out promptly once the refusal of refugee recognition becomes final, the court found that the public interest need to issue the order right after the application is not great.

What to check in a similar situation

Immigration and foreigner offices can confirm how a refugee application is being processed and whether a deportation order is being enforced. Courts can confirm the progress of a related lawsuit.

Terms explained

deportation order
An order from an administrative authority requiring a foreign national to leave Korea.
abuse of discretion
Going beyond or misusing the room for judgment given to an authority. A measure like this can be seen as unlawful.
refugee application
A request to the authorities to be recognized as a refugee.
enforcement
Actually carrying out an order that has been issued.

More rulings on this topic

See all 29 rulings on Refugees →

Frequently asked questions

Who brought the lawsuit?

A person who had applied for refugee recognition sued as the plaintiff over the deportation order.

How did the court rule?

It found the order an unlawful measure that exceeded and abused discretion. It saw little benefit in an order right after the application if it would not be enforced.

Does this result apply directly to similar cases?

It is the court's judgment in this case and cannot be said to apply directly to other cases.

Source and original

Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide

View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=15244&gubun=44

See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44

Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html

← Back to ruling news