Nationality & NaturalizationAdministrative
Ruling on the rejection of a nationality renunciation report by a dual national who lived in Korea with a father serving in U.S. Forces Korea
The short answer: The Seoul High Court ruled that the applicant won.
A dual national born in the United States reported renunciation of nationality, but the Minister of Justice refused to accept the report. The court ruled in favor of the applicant.
Who this helps
This may help people curious about a case where a dual national's nationality renunciation report was returned because of a base of life in Korea.
Case overview
- Case number
- 2022누54278
- Court
- Seoul High Court
- Date of judgment
- Topic
- Nationality & Naturalization
- Original title (Korean)
복수국적자의 국적이탈신고 당시 주한미군인 아버지를 따라 한국에서 생활하였고 그때까지 국내에서 보낸 기간이…
The applicant is a dual national born in the United States. The father held Korean nationality and later acquired U.S. nationality; the mother is a U.S. national. The father was posted to U.S. Forces Korea, and the family lived in Korea for about 8 years, where the applicant attended a school on a U.S. military base. In 2018, as a high school student, the applicant reported renunciation of Korean nationality. The Minister of Justice refused to accept the report, citing a base of life in Korea.
Can a renunciation report be returned just because someone lived long in Korea?
The applicant is a dual national born in the U.S. The father was posted to U.S. Forces Korea, so the applicant lived in Korea with the parents for about 8 years and attended a school on a U.S. base. The applicant filed the report in 2018 as a high school student. The Minister of Justice returned it, saying there was a base of life in Korea. The court held that having a daily-life base in Korea does not immediately mean there is no base of life abroad.
How the court ruled
The court held that a base of daily life in Korea does not immediately mean no base of life abroad. It examined whether the stay in Korea was for continued residence or a temporary occasion, whether the person lived with parents, whether special treatment applied under international law or treaties, and whether the person has actually lived at the reported foreign address for a considerable period and still maintains economic ties there. If that address is the base of life and a return there soon is expected, it falls under having a domicile abroad under the Nationality Act. The applicant won.
What to check in a similar situation
The reason for returning a renunciation report can be confirmed with the immigration office that received it and the Ministry of Justice. The procedure for challenging a return can be confirmed with the courts.
- Find your immigration office
- Find support centers
- Contacts: Immigration Contact Center 1345
Terms explained
- Dual national
- A person who holds the nationality of two or more countries at the same time.
- Nationality renunciation report
- A report stating that a person gives up Korean nationality.
- Return decision
- An administrative decision that sends a report back without accepting it.
- Base of life
- The main place where a person lives daily. In this case, the dispute was whether Korea or the foreign country was that place.
More rulings on this topic
- Ruling Upholds Rejection of a Report of Renunciation of Nationality · Seoul Administrative Court
- Ruling That Denial of Naturalization to a Person With a Criminal Record Was Not Unlawful · Seoul Administrative Court
- Ruling cancels denial of Korean nationality restoration after U.S. citizenship · Seoul Administrative Court
Frequently asked questions
Who brought the lawsuit?
A dual national born in the U.S. brought it, after the Minister of Justice returned the renunciation report.
How did the court decide?
The court held that a daily-life base in Korea does not immediately mean there is no base of life abroad. The applicant won.
Does this result apply as-is to similar cases?
It is the decision in that case and does not apply as-is to other cases. The court looked at things like the purpose of the stay, living with parents, and life at the foreign address.
Source and original
Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide
View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=25259&gubun=44
See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44
Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html