This is an AI translation. Check dates, amounts and eligibility against the Korean original and the official page.

Search

Enter for all results, Esc to close

RefugeesAdministrative

Court cancels decision not to review a refugee status application

The short answer: The applicant won, because the court canceled the decision not to review the refugee application.

The court cancelled a decision not to review a refugee status application that was not clearly without grounds.

Who this helps

This may help people whose refugee application was not sent to a full review. It concerns a case where that refusal was challenged in court.

Case overview

Case number
2015구합1704
Court
Incheon District Court
Date of judgment
Topic
Refugees
Original title (Korean)
난민인정심사불회부결정을 취소한 사례

A decision was made not to review a refugee status application. A lawsuit was then filed seeking to cancel that decision.

Is it unlawful to skip the review of a refugee application that is not clearly baseless?

A decision was made not to conduct a refugee status review for an application. A lawsuit was filed asking the court to cancel that decision. The court found the application was not clearly without merit. It held that deciding not to review it was wrong and canceled the decision.

How the court ruled

The court found that the refugee application was not a case that was clearly without grounds. It held that the decision not to review it was wrong and cancelled that decision.

What to check in a similar situation

Information about how refugee applications are screened and how a decision not to review can be challenged is available from immigration and foreigner offices and from the courts.

Terms explained

Decision not to review
An official decision that a refugee application will not go through the refugee status review. The application is set aside before its substance is examined.
Clearly without merit
A claim that is plainly baseless on its face. In this case, the court found the application did not fall into this category.
Cancellation of a disposition
A court ruling that removes the legal effect of an administrative decision. Here, it applied to the decision not to review.

More rulings on this topic

See all 29 rulings on Refugees →

Frequently asked questions

Who brought the lawsuit and what did they ask for?

A person whose refugee application was not sent to review brought the suit. They asked the court to cancel the decision not to review it.

How did the court rule?

The court found the application was not clearly without merit. It held that the decision not to review was wrong and canceled it.

Does this result apply to every similar case?

No. It is the court's judgment in this one case and does not automatically apply to other cases.

Source and original

Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide

View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=17054&gubun=44

See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44

Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html

← Back to ruling news