RefugeesAdministrative
Court cancels decision not to review a refugee status application
The short answer: The applicant won, because the court canceled the decision not to review the refugee application.
The court cancelled a decision not to review a refugee status application that was not clearly without grounds.
Who this helps
This may help people whose refugee application was not sent to a full review. It concerns a case where that refusal was challenged in court.
Case overview
- Case number
- 2015구합1704
- Court
- Incheon District Court
- Date of judgment
- Topic
- Refugees
- Original title (Korean)
난민인정심사불회부결정을 취소한 사례
A decision was made not to review a refugee status application. A lawsuit was then filed seeking to cancel that decision.
Is it unlawful to skip the review of a refugee application that is not clearly baseless?
A decision was made not to conduct a refugee status review for an application. A lawsuit was filed asking the court to cancel that decision. The court found the application was not clearly without merit. It held that deciding not to review it was wrong and canceled the decision.
How the court ruled
The court found that the refugee application was not a case that was clearly without grounds. It held that the decision not to review it was wrong and cancelled that decision.
What to check in a similar situation
Information about how refugee applications are screened and how a decision not to review can be challenged is available from immigration and foreigner offices and from the courts.
- Find your immigration office
- Find support centers
- Contacts: Immigration Contact Center 1345
Terms explained
- Decision not to review
- An official decision that a refugee application will not go through the refugee status review. The application is set aside before its substance is examined.
- Clearly without merit
- A claim that is plainly baseless on its face. In this case, the court found the application did not fall into this category.
- Cancellation of a disposition
- A court ruling that removes the legal effect of an administrative decision. Here, it applied to the decision not to review.
More rulings on this topic
- Court upholds refusal of refugee status, finding a family property dispute is not a ground for recognition · Jeju District Court
- Ruling that upheld the cancellation of refugee status granted on the basis of false statements · Seoul Administrative Court
- Ruling Cancelling Decision Not to Refer Guinean National's Refugee Application for Examination · Busan District Court
Frequently asked questions
Who brought the lawsuit and what did they ask for?
A person whose refugee application was not sent to review brought the suit. They asked the court to cancel the decision not to review it.
How did the court rule?
The court found the application was not clearly without merit. It held that the decision not to review was wrong and canceled it.
Does this result apply to every similar case?
No. It is the court's judgment in this one case and does not automatically apply to other cases.
Source and original
Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide
View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=17054&gubun=44
See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44
Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html