This is an AI translation. Check dates, amounts and eligibility against the Korean original and the official page.

Search

Enter for all results, Esc to close

Departure Orders, Deportation & EnforcementAdministrative

Court revokes repeated extensions of exit ban

The short answer: The plaintiff won, as the court cancelled the extension of the exit ban.

After an exit ban was imposed because of a criminal investigation, the period was extended in 1-month increments for over two years and one month. The court revoked the extension measure.

Who this helps

This may help people whose exit ban for a criminal investigation was extended again and again. It only covers the kind of dispute described in this ruling.

Case overview

Case number
2023구단76184
Court
Seoul Administrative Court
Posted on original board
Topic
Departure Orders, Deportation & Enforcement
Original title (Korean)
[일반] 범죄 수사를 위하여 출국이 적당하지 않다'는 출입국관리법 제4조 제2항…

An exit ban was first imposed on the grounds that leaving the country was not appropriate because of a criminal investigation. Afterward, for over two years and one month, measures extending the exit ban period in 1-month increments were repeated. A lawsuit was filed over the extension measure.

Can an exit ban for a criminal investigation keep being extended month after month?

An exit ban was first issued because leaving the country was judged unsuitable for a criminal investigation. After that, it was extended in one-month steps for more than about two years and one month. The plaintiff sued over the extension. The court found that material evidence in the criminal case was already secured and that ties to family living in Korea were fairly clear. So it held that the grounds for the ban no longer existed and cancelled the extension.

How the court ruled

The court found that physical evidence in the criminal case had already been secured. It also found that ties and roots with family members living in Korea were relatively clear. For these reasons, it judged that grounds for banning departure could no longer be regarded as met, and it revoked the measure extending the exit ban period.

What to check in a similar situation

Details on how an exit ban and its extensions are handled can be checked with the immigration office or the court that handles the case. These bodies can also confirm the stated grounds for an extension.

Terms explained

Exit ban
An administrative measure that bars a person from leaving the country. Here it was based on the need for a criminal investigation.
Extension disposition
A decision that lengthens the period of an exit ban. In this case it was repeated in one-month steps.
Cancellation of disposition
A court ruling that removes the legal effect of an administrative decision. Here the extension of the exit ban was cancelled.

More rulings on this topic

See all 18 rulings on Departure Orders, Deportation & Enforcement →

Frequently asked questions

Who brought the lawsuit and who won?

The person subject to the exit ban brought the suit as the plaintiff. The court cancelled the extension, so the plaintiff won.

Why did the court cancel the extension?

The court found that material evidence in the criminal case was already secured. It also found that the plaintiff's ties to family living in Korea were fairly clear. It concluded the grounds for the ban were no longer met.

Does this result apply to every similar case?

No. It is the court's decision in this one case and does not apply as is to other cases.

Source and original

Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide

View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=25813&gubun=44

See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44

Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html

← Back to ruling news