This is an AI translation. Check dates, amounts and eligibility against the Korean original and the official page.

Search

Enter for all results, Esc to close

Nationality & NaturalizationAdministrative

Court revokes decision not to grant naturalization

The short answer: The court revoked the decision not to grant naturalization, so the plaintiff won.

A lawsuit was filed against a decision not to grant naturalization. The court revoked that decision.

Who this helps

This ruling may help people looking at cases where a naturalization denial was disputed. It is relevant to cases about the good conduct and livelihood requirements.

Case overview

Case number
2020구합78315
Court
Seoul Administrative Court
Posted on original board
Topic
Nationality & Naturalization
Original title (Korean)
[일반] 원고가 귀화요건인 품행단정 및 생계유지 능력을…

There was a decision not to grant naturalization, and a lawsuit was filed asking the court to revoke it. Good conduct and the ability to make a living were at issue as requirements for naturalization.

Can a naturalization denial be revoked over the conduct and livelihood requirements?

There was a decision not to grant naturalization, and the plaintiff sued to have it revoked. The dispute was whether the plaintiff met the naturalization requirements of good conduct and the ability to make a living. The court found ample room to view the plaintiff as meeting both. It therefore revoked the decision.

How the court ruled

The court found that there was sufficient reason to view the plaintiff as meeting the naturalization requirements of good conduct and the ability to make a living. Therefore, it revoked the decision not to grant naturalization.

What to check in a similar situation

The procedure and requirements for naturalization can be confirmed with the immigration office. Information on lawsuits against a denial can be confirmed with the court.

Terms explained

Naturalization
A process in which a foreign national is reviewed and then acquires Korean nationality.
Good conduct
One naturalization requirement. It asks whether a person's everyday behavior can be seen as upright.
Ability to make a living
One naturalization requirement. It asks whether a person can support themselves.
Revocation of a decision
A court strips an administrative decision of its effect.

More rulings on this topic

See all 11 rulings on Nationality & Naturalization →

Frequently asked questions

Who filed the lawsuit?

The plaintiff, who was not granted naturalization, sued to have the denial revoked.

How did the court rule?

It found ample room to view the plaintiff as meeting the conduct and livelihood requirements, and revoked the decision.

Does this result apply directly to similar cases?

It is the court's judgment in that case and does not apply directly to other cases.

Source and original

Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide

View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=22408&gubun=44

See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44

Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html

← Back to ruling news