Departure Orders, Deportation & EnforcementAdministrative
Court upholds departure order against foreign worker who drove under the influence
The short answer: The court held the departure order against the foreign worker to be justified.
The court ruled that the departure order against a foreign worker who drove under the influence was justified.
Who this helps
This may help people looking into how a court treated a departure order issued to a foreign worker over drunk driving.
Case overview
- Case number
- 2022구합198
- Court
- Ulsan District Court
- Posted on original board
- Topic
- Departure Orders, Deportation & Enforcement
- Original title (Korean)
음주운전을 한 외국인 근로자에 대한…
A lawsuit was filed over a departure order against a foreign worker who drove under the influence.
Is a departure order against a foreign worker who drove drunk justified?
A lawsuit was filed over a departure order issued to a foreign worker who drove under the influence. The dispute was about whether the order was proper. The Ulsan District Court found the order justified. The summary does not give further detail on the court's reasoning.
How the court ruled
The court held that the departure order against the foreign worker who drove under the influence was justified.
What to check in a similar situation
Immigration offices are where departure orders and related procedures are handled. The court that decided the case holds the case record for case number 2022Guhap198.
- Find your immigration office
- Extending your period of stay
- Contacts: Immigration Contact Center 1345
Terms explained
- Departure order
- An official order that requires a foreign national to leave the country. It is issued by the immigration authorities.
- Administrative disposition
- A decision by a government agency that directly affects a specific person. A court can review whether it was proper.
- Foreign worker
- A foreign national who works in Korea. In this case, the person who received the order was a foreign worker.
More rulings on this topic
- Suit to confirm no duty to pay Immigration Act fine under notification disposition inadmissible · Seoul Administrative Court
- Case on whether a decision rejecting an objection to a detention order can be challenged in court · Seoul High Court
- Ruling on a Departure Order Issued to a Person Who Entered on Working Holiday (H-1) Status · Seoul Administrative Court
See all 18 rulings on Departure Orders, Deportation & Enforcement →
Frequently asked questions
Who was the order issued to?
It was issued to a foreign worker who had driven under the influence.
How did the court decide?
The Ulsan District Court found the departure order justified.
Does this result apply the same way to every similar case?
No. It is the court's decision in this one case and does not automatically apply to other cases.
Source and original
Source: Republic of Korea Courts, Major Rulings of Courts Nationwide
View original ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsViewAction.work?seqnum=24735&gubun=44
See the full Major Rulings board ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/dcboard/DcNewsListAction.work?gubun=44
Supreme Court copyright policy ↗https://www.scourt.go.kr/portal/popup/jeojak_pop.html